Click here to MyFlorida Home Page  
Clear Dot Image Cabinet Affairs
*

AGENDA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND

NOVEMBER 29, 1995

*

Item 1 Minutes

Submittal of the minutes of the October 12, 1995 Cabinet Meeting.

RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE

* Item 2 Quarterly Management Report Submittal of the Quarterly Management Report for the first quarter, SFY 1995-96.

RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE

* Item 3 Krysher/Delzer/Feddeler Option Agreement/Florida Springs Coastal Greenway CARL Project REQUEST: Consideration of an option agreement to acquire 28.5 acres within the Homosassa Reserve/Walker Property Area of the Florida Springs Coastal Greenway CARL project from Walter B. Krysher, Ruth E. Krysher, Harvey V. Delzer, Hilda P. Delzer, Carl A. Feddeler and Mary Louise Feddeler. COUNTY: Citrus LOCATION: Section 01, Township 20 South, Range 17 East CONSIDERATION: $414,000

REVIEW NO. 519001

APPRAISED BY
                         EMERSON   TOBIAS  APPROVED  PURCHASE   OPTION
SELLER          ACRES  (04/21/95) 04/21/95  VALUE     PRICE      DATE
------         ------- ----------  ------- --------  ---------  -------
Krysher, et al  28.5    $445,000  $452,300  $452,300  $414,000  03/31/96


STAFF REMARKS:
 The Florida Springs Coastal Greenway  CARL project  is  ranked  
number 2 on the CARL Substantially  Complete List approved by the 
Board of Trustees on February 14, 1995,  and is  eligible  for negotiation 
under the Division of  State  LandsLand  Acquisition Workplan.  
This project contains 40,262  acres, of  which  27,619.01  acres  
have  been  acquired  or  are  under agreement  to be acquired.  
After the Board of Trustees  approves this  agreement, 12,614.49 
acres or 31.33 percent of the  project will remain to be negotiated.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.
In  the  event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained
prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect
the  value  of  the property, staff will so advise the  Board  of
Trustees prior to closing.

A  certified  survey and environmental audit will be provided  by
the purchaser prior to closing.

One of the most important aspects of the Homosassa Reserve/Walker
property  is  its  geographic position  between  other  protected
conservation  lands  and its consequent  value  as  an  ecosystem
corridor.   Acquisition of this property will fill a gap  between
the  Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge, The  Chassahowitzka
State  Wildlife Management Area, the Crystal River State Reserve,
the  St. Martins River CARL project, the Homosassa Springs  State
Wildlife  Park,  and  the  St. Martins  Marsh  Aquatic  Preserve.
Waters  in the adjacent Chassahowitzka Bay and St. Martins  Marsh
Aquatic  Preserve are designated Outstanding Florida Waters,  and
acquisition  of  this property will help protect these  resources
from possible adverse effects of private land uses.

                                        Board of Trustees
                                        Agenda  -  November  29,
                                        1995
                                        Page Two

*


Item 3, cont.

This  property will be managed as an addition to the state forest
and wildlife management area with the Division of Forestry of the
Department  of  Agriculture and Consumer  Services  as  the  lead
management  agency  and the Florida Game  and  Fresh  Water  Fish
Commission as a cooperating manager.

This  acquisition  is consistent with section 187.201(10),  F.S.,
the  Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the  State
Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 3, Pages 1-24)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL

* Item 4 The Nature Conservancy Purchase Agreement/Sebastian Creek and Lake George CARL Projects REQUEST: Consideration of the acquisition of a purchase agreement to acquire 7,100 acres within the Sebastian Creek CARL project and 8,252.64 acres within the Lake George CARL project from The Nature Conservancy (TNC). COUNTY: Indian River and Brevard (Sebastian Creek) Volusia (Lake George) LOCATION: Sections 24-29 and 32-36, Township 15 South, Range 28 East; Se ctions 01-05, 09-12, 16, 45 and 46, Township 16 South, Range 28 East; Section 31, Township 15 South, Range 29 East; Sections 06 and 16, Township 16 South, Range 29 East; Sections 13-19 and 21-28, Township 30 and 31 South, Range 38 East (Lake George); and Sections 15, 21 and 22, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, Indian River County and a portion of the Fleming Grant lying in Indian River and Brevard Counties (Sebastian Creek) CONSIDERATION: $30,100,000 ($100,000 for the acquisition of the purchase agreement; $30,000,000 for the purchase of the property)

REVIEW NO 519002

APPRAISED BY
                       Rogers         Gray       APPROVED   PURCHASE CLOSING
PROJECT    ACRES     (03/15/95)     (03/26/95)    VALUE      PRICE    DATE
---------  -------   ----------    ----------    -------     ------- ------
Sebastian  7,100.00  $20,590,000    $21,300,000 $21,300,000
Creek

                     Hamilton       Santangini
                     (02/23/93)     (02/25/93)
                     ----------     ----------
Lake       8,252.64   $8,665,000     $9,903,168  $9,903,168
George    _________                              __________  __________

          15,352.64                             $31,203,168 $30,000,000  03/01/96 or 45 days after Purchaser's receipt of the final
       survey, whichever is later

STAFF REMARKS: The Sebastian Creek CARL project in  ranked
number  4  on  the Bargain/Shared Projects List approved  by  the
Board  of  Trustees  on February 14, 1995, and  is  eligible  for
negotiation  under the Division of State Lands  Land  Acquisition
Work  plan.   This project contains 16,239 acres, of which  6,894
acres  have been acquired or are under agreement  to be acquired.
After  the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 2,245 acres
or  13.82 percent of the project will remain to be acquired.  The
Lake  George CARL project is ranked number 7 on the Substantially
Complete  Projects  List approved by the  Board  of  Trustees  on
February  14, 1995, and  is eligible  for negotiation  under  the
Division  of  State  Lands  Land

                                        Board of Trustees
                                        Agenda  -  November  29,
                                        1995
                                        Page Three

*


Item 4, cont.

Acquisition  Workplan.  This project contains  40,357  acres,  of
which  28,606 acres have been acquired or are under agreement  to
be   acquired.   After  the  Board  of  Trustees  approves   this
agreement,  3,498.36 acres or 8.67 percent of  the  project  will
remain to be negotiated.

Pursuant  to  a multi-party  agreement entered into  between  the
Division  of  State  Lands and TNC, TNC has acquired  a  purchase
agreement   to  purchase 7,100 acres within the  Sebastian  Creek
CARL  project  and  8,252.64 acres within the  Lake  George  CARL
project  from Anthony A. Coraci and D.S.C. of Newark Enterprises,
Inc.  If  this  item  is approved, the Board  of  Trustees   will
acquire  the  purchase  from  TNC for  $100,000.   The  Board  of
Trustees may then purchase the property.  The assignment  of  the
purchase  agreement further provides that  in no event  will  the
purchase  price for the purchase agreement and purchase price  of
the property exceed the approved value of the property.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.
A   title commitment has been provided by seller on each property
and  is  currently  under  review by staff.   In  the  event  the
commitments for title insurance reveal any encumbrances which may
affect the value of the properties or proposed management of  the
properties, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees  prior  to
closing.

There  is  an existing cattle, hunting and agricultural lease  on
each  property.   As part of the negotiations, an  agreement  was
reached  for  the  seller to terminate each lease  on  or  before
closing.   Upon termination of each lease at closing, the  seller
will  then  enter  into a new lease on each property  which  will
allow  for cattle operations only and each lease will be assigned
to  the  Board of Trustees.  The new lease will cover the  entire
property and require the lessee to maintain the property, keep in
force  general liability insurance, observe all applicable  state
laws  and  cooperate  in the joint use of  the  property  by  the
public.  Extension of the existing leases in the form of the  new
leases is required because a number of the cattle on the property
are  pregnant at this time and if the seller was forced  to  move
cattle prior to closing, there is a probability of high mortality
for  the  cattle and calves would be at a great risk.  The  lease
will  expire  on September 1, 1996.  The managing  agencies  have
determined  that the cattle leases will not effect the management
of  the  properties and the managing agencies and staff recommend
the acquisition of these parcels subject to the cattle leases.

During preliminary negotiations, seller disclosed that there were
five   distinct  areas  on  the  Sebastian  Creek  property  with
potential  environmental  problems.   TNC  contracted   with   an
environmental  engineering firm to provide an environmental  site
assessment (ESA) on each property.  Upon closing, purchaser  will
reimburse TNC for actual, reasonable costs of the ESA.   The  ESA
did   not   reveal  any  hazardous  substances,  or   any   other
environmental conditions on the Lake George property which  would
interfere   with  ownership  or  management   of  that  property.
However,  the  ESA  on  the  Sebastian  Creek  property  revealed
elevated  levels  of arsenic, lead and chromium  (the  "Metals"),
which  exceed DEP groundwater standards.  The elevated levels  of
the  Metals  were identified on a 16 acre area of  the  Sebastian
creek   property  which  was  formerly  permitted  as  a   citrus
wastewater  disposal area (the "Sprayfield").   After  consulting
with DEP's Bureau of Waste Cleanup and Technical Review, Staff is
conducting  further testing to validate the initial test  results
and  to  delineate the extent and degree of the contamination  on
the  property,  if  any.   In the event  additional  testing  and
analysis  confirms the presence of contamination on the property,
which in the opinion of the Bureau of Waste Cleanup would require
remediation, then the closing will be delayed until such time  as
the seller remediates the site to levels acceptable to the Bureau
of  Waste  Cleanup, or the contaminated portion of  the  property
could  be  cut  out of this acquisition, and the closing  on  the
contaminated portion of the property could be delayed until  such
time as remediation is complete, in which case the purchase price
would  be  adjusted  accordingly.  Alternatively,  purchaser  may
terminate this agreement.  In the event further testing  confirms
the presence of contamination on the property but, in the opinion
of the

                                        Board of Trustees
                                        Agenda  -  November  29,
                                        1995
                                        Page Four

*

Item 4, cont.

Bureau  of Waste Cleanup, such contamination, in the interest  of
the public health, safety and welfare, does not require some form
of  remediation, then the purchaser will proceed with the closing
after making a determination that the area of contamination  will
not  effect  the  ownership or management of  the  property.   In
addition  to the Metals found in the Sprayfield on the  Sebastian
Creek  property, testing in the vicinity of a maintenance  garage
indicated  that  groundwater concentrations of trimethyl  benzene
and  naphthalene  were  elevated above  guidance  concentrations.
Guidance  concentrations  are  recommended  levels  above   which
prolonged   exposure  may  result  in  adverse  health   effects.
Currently  there  are  no  drinking  water  standards  for  these
compounds.    It  is  not  anticipated  that  these   groundwater
concentrations  will affect the ownership or  management  of  the
property by the managing agency.

A  certified survey is currently underway and will be provided by
the  seller with the purchaser reimbursing the seller for  actual
reasonable costs.

Sebastian Creek, one of the most important aggregation sites  for
the endangered manatee on Florida's east coast, is surrounded  by
a  large island of natural flatwoods, marshes, swamps, and  scrub
in  a  sea of agriculture and housing.  The Sebastian Creek  CARL
project will protect the manatee by protecting the natural  lands
in  the  creek  basin and will give the residents  of  the  fast-
growing cities of Brevard and Indian River counties a large  area
for  fishing, hiking, and other pursuits.  The hammocks,  swamps,
and  pine plantations east and south of Lake George are important
habitat  for  bald eagles, black bear, and other wildlife.   They
are  also important in maintaining the water quality of the lake,
one  of  the most popular in the state for recreation.  The  Lake
George   CARL  project  will  protect  and  restore  the  natural
commonties  of  this  area; preserve a large area  for  wildlife,
together  with  the  Ocala  National  Forest  and  Lake  Woodruff
National Wildlife Refuge; and ensure that the public will be able
to enjoy the recreational and scenic values of Lake George in the
future.

The  Sebastian Creek property will be managed by the Division  of
Marine  Resources in an effort to protect the West Indian Manatee
by  providing an upland buffer to Sebastian Creek and by limiting
development  in  the  area,  thereby maintaining  upland  habitat
diversity  and protecting the water quality of the Indian  River-
Malabar to Vero Beach Aquatic Preserve.

The  Lake  George  property will be managed  by the  Division  of
Forestry  to restore, maintain and protect all native ecosystems;
to  integrate  compatible  human use;  and  to  insure  long-term
viability of rare population of species.

This  acquisition  is consistent with section 187.201(10),  F.S.,
the  Natural Systems and Recreational Land section of  the  State
Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 4, Pages 1-101)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL

* Item 5 C. Austin Bryant Option Agreement/Paynes Creek Division of Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings Project REQUEST: Consideration of an option agreement to acquire 26.2 acres within the Paynes Creek Division of Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings project from C. Austin Bryant. COUNTY: Hardee LOCATION: Section 09, Township 33 South, Range 25 East Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Five * Item 5, cont. CONSIDERATION: $60,000

REVIEW NO. 519003

APPRAISED BY
                   Porter     APPROVED  PURCHASE   OPTION
SELLER      ACRES (03/14/95)   VALUE     PRICE      DATE
-------     -----  ---------   -------  ------    ---------
Bryant      26.2   $62,400    $62,400   $60,000    03/30/96

STAFF  REMARKS:   The  Paynes  Creek  project  is   ranked
number  41  on the Recreation and Parks Additions and  Inholdings
list.   This  agreement was negotiated by the Division  of  State
Lands on behalf of the Division of Recreation and Parks under the
Additions and Inholdings Preservation 2000 program.

When  the  appraisal was ordered, the quality of access  was  not
known.   Consequently, the appraiser was asked to  supply  values
with   access  and  without access. The contract  was  negotiated
based  on the assumption that no legal access exists.  Since  the
state  owns  the  adjoining property, this will  not  effect  the
management of the property.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.
In  the event  the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained
prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect
the  value  of  the  property or the proposed management  of  the
property,  staff  will so advise the Board of Trustees  prior  to
closing.

A  certified  survey  and environmental site assessment  will  be
provided by  the purchaser prior to closing.

This  property  will be managed as an addition  to  Paynes  Creek
State Historic Site by the Division of Recreation and Parks.

This  acquisition  is consistent with section 187.201(10),  F.S.,
the  Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the  State
Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 5, Pages 1-20)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL

* Item 6 Roger Alan Pangborn/Donna Lou Wicker- Option Agreement/Goldhead Branch Division of Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings Project REQUEST: Consideration of an option agreement to acquire 19.8 acres within the Goldhead Branch Division of Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings project from Roger Alan Pangborn and Donna Lou Wicker. COUNTY: Clay LOCATION: Section 07, Township 08 South, Range 24 East CONSIDERATION: $41,500

REVIEW NO. 519004

APPRAISED BY
                        Emerson   APPROVED PURCHASE   OPTION
SELLER          ACRES  (03/01/95)  VALUE    PRICE     DATE
--------        ------  ----------  -----   ------    --------
Pangborn, et al  19.8   $50,500   $50,500   $41,500  03/30/96


                                       Board of Trustees
                                        Agenda  - November  29,
                                        1995
                                        Page Six

*


Item 6, cont.

STAFF  REMARKS:   The Goldhead Branch  project  is  ranked
number  44  on the Recreation and Parks Additions and  Inholdings
list.   This  agreement was negotiated by the Division  of  State
Lands on behalf of the Division of Recreation and Parks under the
Additions and Inholdings Preservation 2000 program.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.
In  the  event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained
prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect
the  value  of  the  property or the proposed management  of  the
property,  staff  will so advise the Board of Trustees  prior  to
closing.

A  certified  survey  and environmental site assessment  will  be
provided by the purchaser prior to closing.

This  property will be managed as an addition to the  Mike  Roess
Goldhead  Branch  State Park by the Division  of  Recreation  and
Parks.

This  acquisition  is consistent with section 187.201(10),  F.S.,
the  Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the  State
Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 6, Pages 1-24)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL

* Item 7 Barry University/Florida Board of Regents/Florida Atlantic University/BOT Purchase Agreement REQUEST: Consideration of a purchase agreement among the Florida Board of Regents, Florida Atlantic University and the Board of Trustees to acquire 50 acres of land from Barry University. COUNTY: St. Lucie APPLICANT:Florida Atlantic University LOCATION: Sections 23, 24, 25 and 26, Township 36 South, Range 39 East CONSIDERATION: $2,350,000

REVIEW NO. 519005

APPRAISED BY
Gray        Ford      APPROVED     PURCHASE  CLOSING
ACRES  (01/27/95)  (01/25/95)       VALUE     PRICE       DATE
-----   ---------    -------     ------      --------    --------
 50    $2,225,000  $2,350,000  $2,350,000   $2,350,000  90 days
                                                        after BOT                                                                               
                                                        approval


STAFF REMARKS:  This acquisition was negotiated by Florida
Atlantic  University  (FAU).  Funds  for  this  acquisition  were
appropriated  by  the  1994  Florida Legislature  and  are  still
available.  The Board of Regents approved this acquisition on May
17, 1994.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.
In  the  event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained
prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may


                                              Board of Trustees
                                              Agenda  -  November  29,
                                              1995
                                              Page Seven

*

Item 7, cont.

affect  the  value of the property or the proposed management  of
the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to
closing.

A  certified  survey  and environmental site assessment  will  be
provided by FAU prior to closing.

This property will be managed by Florida Atlantic University as a
satellite campus through a lease to the Florida Board of Regents.

This  acquisition  is consistent with section 187.201(01),  F.S.,
the Education section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 7, Pages 1-27)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL

* Item 8 Release of P2000 Funds to Acquire Interest/SJRWMD/Pumpkin Hill CARL Project REQUEST: Release of $602,470.17 from the Preservation 2000 Trust Fund for the acquisition of an undivided 50 percent interest in 650.97 acres within the Pumpkin Hill CARL project from the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) COUNTY: Duval LOCATION: Sections 29 and 30, Township 01 North, Range 28 East; and Section 31, Township 01 North, Range 28 East. CONSIDERATION: $602,470.17 (The Board of Trustees 50 percent share of the total purchase price of $1,204,940.35) STAFF REMARKS: The Pumpkin Hill Creek CARL project is ranked number 19 on the 1995 CARL Bargain\Shared Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 14, 1995, and qualifies for purchase under the Division of State Lands Land Acquisition Workplan. The Pumpkin Hill Creek project contains 6,292 acres, of which 2,655 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 2,986 acres or 47.5 percent of this project will remain to be acquired. On September 13, 1994, the Board of Trustees authorized staff to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with the District to acquire the Pumpkin Hill Creek CARL project in accordance with section 259.041(16), F.S. (1994) utilizing the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S., with some technical survey modifications that have been incorporated into the Agreement. On September 14, 1994, the Governing Board of the District approved and executed the Acquisition Agreement and it has been executed by the Director of the Division of State Lands on behalf of the Board of Trustees. The District has acquired the Wallace/Kogut and Penland property, lying within the Pumpkin Hill project, in fee simple utilizing District acquisition procedures set out in Section 373.139, F.S. Title to the parcel is currently held jointly by the District and the Board of Trustees. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, on January 11, 1995 and February 8, 1995, respectively, the Governing Board of the District adopted Resolution No. 95-08 & Resolution 95-10, respectively, requesting reimbursement from the Board of Trustees for the costs for acquisition Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Eight * Item 8, cont. of the Penland and Wallace/Kogut parcels. The resolution contains all of the assurances required by the Acquisition Agreement. As provided for in the Acquisition Agreement, the District has requested reimbursement of 50 percent of its preacquisition costs (appraisal fees) and reimbursement of 50 percent of its closing costs (recording, title insurance policy and survey costs). Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, the preacquisition and closing costs will be reimbursed from CARL incidental expense funds previously released by the Board of Trustees. The Districts resolution contains all of the assurances required by the Acquisition Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the District contracted to purchase Penlands ownership at 100 percent of the approved value and Wallace/Kogut ownership at 93 percent of the approved value. The Board of Trustees' purchase price will be 50 percent of the contract price negotiated by the District plus 50 percent of the costs incurred in the purchase of the property. The property will be managed as the Pumpkin Hill Creek Buffer State Reserve by the Division of Marine Resources. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 8, Pages 1-15)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL

* Item 9 St.Johns River Water Management District Acquisition Agreement/Etoniah Creek/Cross Florida Greenway CARL Projects REQUEST: Authority to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with St. Johns River Water Management District for the Etoniah Creek\Cross Florida Greenway CARL projects. COUNTY: Putnam and Clay LOCATION: Sections 28-33, Township 07 South, Range 25 East; Sections 22-27, Township 08 South, Range 24 East; Sections 01-35, Township 8 South, Range 25 East; Sections 12 and 13, Township 09 South, Range 24 East; Sections 01-38, Township 09 South, Range 25 East; Sections 18, 19, 30, 31, 39 and 40, Township 09 South, Range 26 East; Sections 01-06, 09-15, 29, 32- 34, Township 10 South, Range 24 East; Sections 01-06, 09-15, 22- 36, Township 10 South, Range 25 East; Sections 06, 07, 18-20, 29- 32, Township 10 South, Range 26 East; Sections 01-06, 13, 14, Township 11 South, Range 24 East; Sections 01-11, 13-15, Township 11 South, Range 25 East; Sections 32, Township 11 South, Range 26 East. STAFF REMARKS: The Etoniah Creek\Cross Florida Greenway CARL project is ranked number 11 on the Priority CARL List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 14, 1995, and is partially funded under the Division of State Lands Land Acquisition Workplan. The proposed agreement covers approximately 15,220 acres within the Project. To facilitate the acquisition of this project, the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) has offered to take the lead in the acquisition of the project. Staff has prepared an agreement that would allow the District to acquire the Etoniah Creek\Cross Florida CARL project in accordance with section 259.041(1), F.S., utilizing the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S. On Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Nine Item 9, cont. September 13, 1994, the Board of Trustees approved the use of the District's procedures to allow the District to acquire lands to be held jointly by the Board of Trustees and the District. At that time the Trustees determined, consistent with section 259.041(1), F.S., that the substitution of the District’s procedures for its own procedures was reasonably prudent and the public's interest was being reasonably protected. This agreement will allow the District to utilize its procedures and acquire the property fully funded by the Board of Trustees with the property vesting entirely with the Board of Trustees. If the Board of Trustees approves this item, the District staff will present the agreement to its Governing Board for execution at its next board meeting. Upon receipt of the executed agreement from the District, staff will execute the agreement on behalf of the Board of Trustees. Incorporated into the agreement are a number of assurances that the District is giving the Board of Trustees in return for its consideration of this agreement. The District has agreed to: 1) comply with the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S.; 2) defend the Board of Trustees against all title and survey disputes or defects and environmental contamination associated with each acquisition negotiated by the District that were either known or should have been known by the District at the time it closes a parcel on behalf of the Board of Trustees; and, 3) reimburse the Board of Trustees 100 percent of any overpayment of the purchase price, if an audit or investigation determines that the purchase price paid exceeded the actual appraised value. Under the proposed agreement, the District staff will obtain and review appraisals, negotiate a purchase contract and secure the approval of its governing board. The District will provide DSL with a board resolution covering the assurances noted in the previous paragraph and requesting authorization to proceed with the purchase of the parcel. Staff will request Board of Trustees' authorization to proceed for each parcel the District contracts to purchase. In addition, the agreement provides for the District to be reimbursed all costs associated with its attempt to acquire lands within the project, including all pre- acquisition and closing related costs, with the pre-acquisition costs being reimbursed even if the District is unsuccessful in acquiring any property. The agreement authorizes staff to reimburse these costs from CARL incidental expense funds previously released by the Board of Trustees. If the Board of Trustees approves the purchase, the District will proceed to closing with title to be vested in the Board of Trustees. Staff recommends that the Board of Trustees find that the procedures set out in Section 373.139 and used by the District are reasonably prudent procedures and the public’s interest is reasonably protected and coupled with the assurances to be provided by the District’s Governing Board meet the standards necessary for ownership by the Board of Trustees. The Etoniah Creek\Cross Florida Greenway CARL project will be managed by the Division of Forestry as a state forest and the Office of Greenways and Trails of the Department of Environmental Protection, will manage the remaining lands in the vicinity of the old Cross Florida Barge Canal. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 9, Pages 1-6)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL

Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Ten * Item 10 10 Year Sovereignty, Submerged Land Live Rock Aquaculture Lease REQUEST: Issuance of a ten-year sovereignty, submerged land live rock aquaculture lease containing 2.5 acres, more or less. COUNTY: Monroe Application No. 44-AQ-215 APPLICANT: Nanette Young LOCATION: Between Long Point Key and Crawl Key, in Florida Bay, in Class III Outstanding Florida Waters, within the local jurisdiction of Monroe County, at the following (latitude/longitude) coordinates: Latitude Longitude Description 80°58'59.76"W 24°45'28.47"N Northwest Corner 80°58'56.33"W 24°45'30.86"N Northeast Corner 80°58'58.90"W 24°45'26.23"N Southwest Corner 80°58'54.57"W 24°45'28.71"N Southeast Corner CONSIDERATION: $61.74, representing (1) an initial lease fee of $15.58 per acre or fraction thereof; and (2) an annual surcharge of $15, representing $5 per acre or fraction thereof, for deposit in the Marine Biological Trust Fund pursuant to Section 370.16(4)(b), F.S. The lease fees shall be adjusted every five years, based upon the five-year average change in the Consumer Price Index. STAFF REMARKS: The applicant is requesting approval of a commercial aquaculture lease to cultivate and harvest artificial live rock within a 2.5 acre parcel of sovereignty, submerged land, in Florida Bay. The proposed project involves the placement of approximately 75,000 pounds of quarried coral (non- indigenous) rock per year, in order to recruit larval marine organisms from a corridor of hard bottom habitat adjacent to the proposed lease site. Once a desired rock growth stage has been achieved, the applicant will harvest the rocks and sell them in conjunction with the aquarium trade. In May 1989 the department adopted a policy against harvesting (wild) live rock within the territorial limits of Florida. Subsequently, on July 1, 1992, the Florida Marine Fisheries Commission closed the harvest of live rock in state waters. In lieu of wild harvest, the department opted to encourage aquaculture, using rock obtained from upland sources as a means to fill the demand of live rock for the aquarium trade (a 1.6 billion dollar U. S. industry, and four billion spent on the aquarium trade worldwide). Live rock is now an integral part of the entire marine life aquarium trade. The federal government has implemented a phase-out of all live rock harvested in federal waters. By the end of 1996, no wild live rock can be harvested in federal waters. As such, persons such as the applicant, whose livelihood is dependent on the harvest of live rock, will be put out of business, unless such harvest takes place on approved live rock aquaculture leases in state waters, and permitted sites in federal waters. The proposed project is located within Monroe County, designated as Outstanding Florida Waters; as such, no dredge/fill permit should be issued if such activity damages the viability of a living stony coral community, soft coral community, sponge bed, or marine seagrass community. The field staff opined that no adverse impacts to those resources would occur because the proposed project was reduced to only 2.5 acres, from the original five acres, and that site is void of seagrass beds and such other significant resources. This position was reaffirmed by the staff of the Submerged Lands and Environmental Resources Permitting Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Eleven * Item 10, cont. Program that indicated that the proposed project qualifies for a deminimus exemption, indicating that no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated from the proposed activities, provided that the special lease conditions were implemented. Objections to the proposed lease were received from staff of the Division of Recreation and Parks' Bureau of Parks District 5 and one property owner. Objections by the DRP were based on the location of the proposed lease within or immediately adjacent to the management line for the Curry Hammock Management Area. Review by the Bureau of Survey and Mapping indicated that the proposed lease was more than 3,000 feet from the management line. Subsequently, the Division of Recreation and Parks recommended that the application be approved and indicated that the distance between the proposed location and the management area is expected to provide an adequate buffer zone and safeguards. The objections of the property owner were also based on the location of the proposed lease and the potential for adverse environmental impacts to adjacent habitats. The proposed lease is about 1,000 feet from the upland property and the attached resource assessment report indicates that the proposed activities are not expected to result in adverse environmental impacts. The proposed project site is an average of ten feet in depth. The applicant's business plan stipulates the preemption of no more than 15 inches of the water column. A consideration of the status of any local government comprehensive plans was not made for this item. The department has determined that the proposed action is not subject to the local government planning process. (See Attachment 10, Pages 1-40) RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO FINAL ACTION BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL LEASE CONDITIONS * Item 11 Eugene M. Steffan (d/b/a Palm Grove Marina, Inc.), Lease Modification REQUEST: Consideration of an application for a modification of a five-year sovereignty, submerged land lease to contain 85,682 square feet, more or less, for an expansion of a commercial marina. COUNTY: Lee Lease No. 360706835 Application No. 360019035 LOCATION: Section 19, Township 46 South, Range 24 East, in Matanzas Pass, Class II Waters, Resource Protection Area 3, within the local jurisdiction of Lee County. Aquatic Preserve: Estero Bay Outstanding Florida Waters: Yes CONSIDERATION: $24,216.78 representing (1) $6,716.78 as the initial lease fee computed at the base rate of $0.1038 per square foot, discounted 30 percent because of the first-come, first- served nature of the facility, and including the initial 25 percent surcharge for the additional area; and (2) $17,500 as an administrative fine. Sales tax will be assessed pursuant to section Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Twelve * Item 11, cont. 212.031, F.S., if applicable. The lease fee may be adjusted based on seven percent of the rental rate pursuant to section 18- 21.011, F.A.C. STAFF REMARKS: The applicant is requesting after-the-fact authorization for a one-slip expansion of an existing 78-slip commercial marina, presently used in conjunction with the upland commercial marina facility, thereby creating a 79-slip facility. The marina currently provides mooring area outside the authorized lease area for a cruise ship. The 165-foot long, 350-passenger, SeaKruz vessel is operated by Europa Cruises Corporation, and transports passengers to beyond the state's territorial limits for gambling excursions. The existing sovereignty, submerged land lease, approved by the Board of Trustees on March 6, 1984, and modified in 1989, authorizes the preemption of 66,756 square feet of sovereignty lands. The proposed expansion area contains 18,926 square feet of sovereignty lands. In November 1991, staff became aware of the lessee's intent to moor a cruise ship at the marina via a local newspaper article and staff subsequently formally notified the lessee by letter dated November 12, 1991, that authorization from the Board of Trustees would be required to moor the cruise ship outside of the current authorized lease area. A December 5, 1991, site inspection confirmed that the cruise ship was mooring at the marina outside of the approved lease area. On December 11, 1992, staff issued a Temporary Use Agreement (TUA) for one year for the temporary use of 11,460 square feet for mooring of the cruise ship. The TUA did not include assessment of an administrative fine for the violation of illegal docking because the lessee had been paying lease fees based on seven percent of the rental rate. However, staff is now requesting the Board of Trustees to consider assessment of an administrative fine because the act of mooring the cruise ship was a direct violation of the lease and it occurred after the November 12, 1991, letter was sent. Initially, staff had proposed not assessing an administrative fine because the applicant was paying for use of the area and it was thought that the processing would be completed within the year allowed under the TUA. The requirements to obtain a modified lease were listed in the November 1991 letter, yet it took the applicant until January 1993 to provide a list of surrounding owners to be noticed and a letter stating consistency with the local comprehensive plan, until October 1993 for the applicant to provide acceptable public interest, and until April 1995 for the applicant to provide an acceptable survey. Initially staff proposed a larger administrative fine based on the length of time taken to complete the lease modification application. However, since staff and the applicant continued to work toward completion of the application, even after the TUA had expired, the fine as currently proposed by staff no longer includes the multiplier for aggravating or mitigating factors. Staff proposes calculating the administrative fine based on the methodology pursuant to Trustees' policy of August 14, 1990, at the rate of $0.50 per square foot. However, because the fine is more than the maximum base fine, the maximum base fine of $2,500 will apply. A multiplier of two is applied to the base fine because the activity took place within an aquatic preserve ($5,000). A multiplier of one is applied since staff is now recommending approval of the previously unauthorized activity ($2,500). A multiplier of four is applied because the existing facility was under lease which constitutes written notice ($10,000). The total recommended administrative fine is $17,500. The applicant stated that the cruise ship has a draft of 6.5 feet, that mean low water depths in the proposed expanded lease area range from -6.3 feet to -16.4 feet, and that mean low water depths in the nearby federal navigation channel range from -10 to -14 feet. Although there are no seagrasses in the area, the following operational procedures negotiated between staff and the applicant to reduce turbidity and prop wash are being implemented: (1) small tug boats are used to guide the vessel during approaches and departures; (2) the vessel is moored so that the propellers are located over deep water in the channel; (3) the vessel approaches and departs Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Thirteen * Item 11, cont. parallel to the dock; and (4) departures entail backing into the federal turning basin with depths of -14 feet. Limitations on the maximum depths of vessels allowed to moor in this area are included as special lease conditions pursuant to section 18- 20.004(5)(a)3, F.A.C. All of the slips will continue to be maintained on an open to the public, first-come, first-served basis; this has been addressed as a special lease condition. The project is located in an aquatic preserve. Staff is of the opinion that the project is in the public interest. The applicant was not required to obtain a DEP wetland resource permit because the additional area was for mooring only; no dredging or filling was to occur. There are no submerged resources or seagrasses in the expansion area. The recommendations of the Division of Marine Resources are included as special lease conditions. The expanded lease area is located within the western 25-foot setback area and a waiver has been obtained from the affected property owner. The lease modification was not required to be noticed. A local government comprehensive plan has been adopted for this area pursuant to section 163.3167, F.S.; however, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) has determined that the plan is not in compliance. In accordance with the compliance agreement between the DCA and the local government, an amendment has been adopted which brought the plan into compliance. The proposed action is consistent with the adopted plan according to a letter received from Lee County. (See Attachment 11, Pages 1-7) RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL LEASE
CONDITIONS AND PAYMENT OF $6,716.78 PLUS
AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $17,500
* Item 12 Island Marina, Inc., Lease Modification REQUEST: Consideration of an application for a modification of a 25-year sovereignty, submerged land lease to contain a total of 66,716 square feet, more or less, for an expansion of an existing commercial docking facility. COUNTY: Collier Lease No. 111000635 Application No. 112545225 LOCATION: Section 17, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in the Cocohatchee River, Class II waters, within the local jurisdiction of Collier County. Aquatic Preserve: No Outstanding Florida Waters: No (currently proposed for OFW status) CONSIDERATION: $5,210.37 as the initial lease fee computed at the base rate of $0.1038 per square foot, discounted 30 percent because of the first-come, first-served nature of the facility, and including the initial 25 percent surcharge payment for the additional area. Sales tax will be assessed pursuant to section 212.031, F.S., if applicable. The lease fee may be adjusted based on seven percent of the rental rate pursuant to section 18- 21.011, F.A.C. Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Fourteen * Item 12, cont. STAFF REMARKS: The applicant is proposing to expand the lease boundary of an existing 80-slip commercial docking facility by extending the boundary waterward of its existing location. The original sovereignty, submerged land lease, approved by the Board of Trustees on February 12, 1991, authorized the preemption of 52,736 square feet of sovereignty lands to construct an 80-slip commercial marina. In 1990, a request was presented to the Board of Trustees from Shelter Island Joint Venture for a submerged land lease for an 80- slip commercial docking facility to be developed in conjunction with a 91-unit condominium. At that time, staff recommended denial because the number of slips exceeded the number allowed for the condominium development. The applicant requested deferral of its request and then withdrawal from the following Board of Trustees meeting to obtain local approval. Subsequently, Shelter Island Joint Venture revised its upland plans by deeding the shoreline to Island Marina, Inc., which then proposed to construct and operate the 80-slip commercial marina. Condominiums were still proposed to be constructed on the interior property and the unit owners would have no riparian shoreline or any rights to use the marina beyond the 21 slips the ownership oriented upland facility would have qualified for had that entity remained the riparian upland property owner. That request was approved and represents the lease in effect today. This lease does not stipulate lengths or drafts of vessels. Subsequent to execution of the 1991 lease, complaints were received regarding advertising associated with the condominium. The 1991 lease contained a special lease condition that required the Lessee to advertise the facility as open to the public on a first-come, first-served basis by constructing permanent signs at the waterward entrance to the docking facility and at the upland entrance to the condominium development to clearly state that all of the berths are available for rental by the general public. The applicant installed the signs; however, advertising associated with the condominium included visuals of the docking facility and provided information on the slips. According to the applicant, 39 advertisements were released by the condominium, three of which referred to a "private marina" being associated with the condominium. The agent for the applicant acknowledged the mistake (after two of the advertisements) and stated that a mistake had been made and the mistake would not occur in the future. Two additional advertisements (dated July 1993 and February 1994) were supplied by the Attorney General's office bringing the total to five erroneous advertisements out of a total of 41. The applicant has stated that the advertising was handled by the condominium, not the marina owner, and that the two entities are separate. At this time, the issue may be moot because all of the units have been sold and the developer is no longer associated with the condominium. The special lease condition pertaining to advertising of marina slips as open to the public was revised to specifically require that "any and all advertising" shall refer to the facility as open to the public; this revised condition will be part of this modified lease. On May 28, 1991, the marina was conveyed to the condominium, incorporated as a unit of the condominium, and reseparated. After this action took place, the department reviewed the transactions and determined that the marina still qualified as a commercial marina. The lease was then amended to add a special lease condition prohibiting future transfers without Trustees' knowledge. The docking facility was not built as originally authorized and permitted; the perimeter dock was constructed two feet wider and four additional access ramps were built. These changes were required by Collier County to accommodate local ordinances. In addition, the perimeter dock was constructed 54 feet longer and placed between three and 14 feet waterward of its approved location in an effort to follow the -4 foot bottom contour. This resulted in a docking structure of the size and configuration authorized by the Board of Trustees, but located outside the lease Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Fifteen * Item 12, cont. boundary. The applicant was notified of the violation and voluntarily removed the portions of the structure that extended beyond the lease boundary. This action brought the project within the preemption limits that had been originally approved. The applicant subsequently sought approval for the revised structure from Collier County, the former DER, and the Board of Trustees. The Division of State Lands authorized a modified lease in 1992 via a delegation of authority to authorize the as- built structures within the original lease boundary. The current request will authorize 13,980 square feet of additional sovereign lands to allow the applicant to install floating finger pier extensions and to relocate and place new mooring pilings, thereby providing wetslips of the size originally authorized by the Board of Trustees within the newly expanded lease area. No additional slips or vessels larger than originally authorized are proposed at this time; however, the DEP Southwest District staff is presently processing a modification to allow larger vessels with deeper drafts and to preempt 14,000 additional square feet. The future request will be presented to the Board of Trustees for consideration when the file is deemed complete. The docking facility will continue to be maintained on an open to the public, first-come, first-served basis; the existing special lease conditions will be included in the modified lease. An April 20, 1994, site inspection verified that the applicant is in compliance with the existing lease and all fees are current. The proposed project is in accordance with the DEP modified wetland resource permit that prohibits liveaboards and fueling facilities, and authorizes a sewage pumpout facility. Recommendations from the Division of Marine Resources regarding manatees and shellfish have been addressed. There are no seagrasses located within the expansion area. The proposed project was not required to be noticed. A local government comprehensive plan has been adopted for this area pursuant to section 163.3167, F.S.; however, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) determined that the plan is not in compliance. In accordance with the Compliance Agreement between DCA and the local government, an amendment has been adopted which brought the plan into compliance. The proposed action is consistent with the adopted plan as amended according to a letter received from Collier County. (See Attachment 12, Pages 1-39) RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL LEASE
CONDITIONS AND PAYMENT OF $5,210.37