Cabinet Affairs |
Item 1 Minutes Submittal of the minutes of the October 12, 1995 Cabinet Meeting.RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE
* Item 2 Quarterly Management Report Submittal of the Quarterly Management Report for the first quarter, SFY 1995-96.RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE
* Item 3 Krysher/Delzer/Feddeler Option Agreement/Florida Springs Coastal Greenway CARL Project REQUEST: Consideration of an option agreement to acquire 28.5 acres within the Homosassa Reserve/Walker Property Area of the Florida Springs Coastal Greenway CARL project from Walter B. Krysher, Ruth E. Krysher, Harvey V. Delzer, Hilda P. Delzer, Carl A. Feddeler and Mary Louise Feddeler. COUNTY: Citrus LOCATION: Section 01, Township 20 South, Range 17 East CONSIDERATION: $414,000
EMERSON TOBIAS APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION SELLER ACRES (04/21/95) 04/21/95 VALUE PRICE DATE ------ ------- ---------- ------- -------- --------- ------- Krysher, et al 28.5 $445,000 $452,300 $452,300 $414,000 03/31/96 STAFF REMARKS: The Florida Springs Coastal Greenway CARL project is ranked number 2 on the CARL Substantially Complete List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 14, 1995, and is eligible for negotiation under the Division of State LandsLand Acquisition Workplan. This project contains 40,262 acres, of which 27,619.01 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 12,614.49 acres or 31.33 percent of the project will remain to be negotiated. All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing. In the event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing. A certified survey and environmental audit will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing. One of the most important aspects of the Homosassa Reserve/Walker property is its geographic position between other protected conservation lands and its consequent value as an ecosystem corridor. Acquisition of this property will fill a gap between the Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge, The Chassahowitzka State Wildlife Management Area, the Crystal River State Reserve, the St. Martins River CARL project, the Homosassa Springs State Wildlife Park, and the St. Martins Marsh Aquatic Preserve. Waters in the adjacent Chassahowitzka Bay and St. Martins Marsh Aquatic Preserve are designated Outstanding Florida Waters, and acquisition of this property will help protect these resources from possible adverse effects of private land uses. Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Two * Item 3, cont. This property will be managed as an addition to the state forest and wildlife management area with the Division of Forestry of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services as the lead management agency and the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission as a cooperating manager. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 3, Pages 1-24)RECOMMEND APPROVAL
* Item 4 The Nature Conservancy Purchase Agreement/Sebastian Creek and Lake George CARL Projects REQUEST: Consideration of the acquisition of a purchase agreement to acquire 7,100 acres within the Sebastian Creek CARL project and 8,252.64 acres within the Lake George CARL project from The Nature Conservancy (TNC). COUNTY: Indian River and Brevard (Sebastian Creek) Volusia (Lake George) LOCATION: Sections 24-29 and 32-36, Township 15 South, Range 28 East; Se ctions 01-05, 09-12, 16, 45 and 46, Township 16 South, Range 28 East; Section 31, Township 15 South, Range 29 East; Sections 06 and 16, Township 16 South, Range 29 East; Sections 13-19 and 21-28, Township 30 and 31 South, Range 38 East (Lake George); and Sections 15, 21 and 22, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, Indian River County and a portion of the Fleming Grant lying in Indian River and Brevard Counties (Sebastian Creek) CONSIDERATION: $30,100,000 ($100,000 for the acquisition of the purchase agreement; $30,000,000 for the purchase of the property)
Rogers Gray APPROVED PURCHASE CLOSING PROJECT ACRES (03/15/95) (03/26/95) VALUE PRICE DATE --------- ------- ---------- ---------- ------- ------- ------ Sebastian 7,100.00 $20,590,000 $21,300,000 $21,300,000 Creek Hamilton Santangini (02/23/93) (02/25/93) ---------- ---------- Lake 8,252.64 $8,665,000 $9,903,168 $9,903,168 George _________ __________ __________ 15,352.64 $31,203,168 $30,000,000 03/01/96 or 45 days after Purchaser's receipt of the final survey, whichever is later STAFF REMARKS: The Sebastian Creek CARL project in ranked number 4 on the Bargain/Shared Projects List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 14, 1995, and is eligible for negotiation under the Division of State Lands Land Acquisition Work plan. This project contains 16,239 acres, of which 6,894 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 2,245 acres or 13.82 percent of the project will remain to be acquired. The Lake George CARL project is ranked number 7 on the Substantially Complete Projects List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 14, 1995, and is eligible for negotiation under the Division of State Lands Land Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Three * Item 4, cont. Acquisition Workplan. This project contains 40,357 acres, of which 28,606 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 3,498.36 acres or 8.67 percent of the project will remain to be negotiated. Pursuant to a multi-party agreement entered into between the Division of State Lands and TNC, TNC has acquired a purchase agreement to purchase 7,100 acres within the Sebastian Creek CARL project and 8,252.64 acres within the Lake George CARL project from Anthony A. Coraci and D.S.C. of Newark Enterprises, Inc. If this item is approved, the Board of Trustees will acquire the purchase from TNC for $100,000. The Board of Trustees may then purchase the property. The assignment of the purchase agreement further provides that in no event will the purchase price for the purchase agreement and purchase price of the property exceed the approved value of the property. All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing. A title commitment has been provided by seller on each property and is currently under review by staff. In the event the commitments for title insurance reveal any encumbrances which may affect the value of the properties or proposed management of the properties, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing. There is an existing cattle, hunting and agricultural lease on each property. As part of the negotiations, an agreement was reached for the seller to terminate each lease on or before closing. Upon termination of each lease at closing, the seller will then enter into a new lease on each property which will allow for cattle operations only and each lease will be assigned to the Board of Trustees. The new lease will cover the entire property and require the lessee to maintain the property, keep in force general liability insurance, observe all applicable state laws and cooperate in the joint use of the property by the public. Extension of the existing leases in the form of the new leases is required because a number of the cattle on the property are pregnant at this time and if the seller was forced to move cattle prior to closing, there is a probability of high mortality for the cattle and calves would be at a great risk. The lease will expire on September 1, 1996. The managing agencies have determined that the cattle leases will not effect the management of the properties and the managing agencies and staff recommend the acquisition of these parcels subject to the cattle leases. During preliminary negotiations, seller disclosed that there were five distinct areas on the Sebastian Creek property with potential environmental problems. TNC contracted with an environmental engineering firm to provide an environmental site assessment (ESA) on each property. Upon closing, purchaser will reimburse TNC for actual, reasonable costs of the ESA. The ESA did not reveal any hazardous substances, or any other environmental conditions on the Lake George property which would interfere with ownership or management of that property. However, the ESA on the Sebastian Creek property revealed elevated levels of arsenic, lead and chromium (the "Metals"), which exceed DEP groundwater standards. The elevated levels of the Metals were identified on a 16 acre area of the Sebastian creek property which was formerly permitted as a citrus wastewater disposal area (the "Sprayfield"). After consulting with DEP's Bureau of Waste Cleanup and Technical Review, Staff is conducting further testing to validate the initial test results and to delineate the extent and degree of the contamination on the property, if any. In the event additional testing and analysis confirms the presence of contamination on the property, which in the opinion of the Bureau of Waste Cleanup would require remediation, then the closing will be delayed until such time as the seller remediates the site to levels acceptable to the Bureau of Waste Cleanup, or the contaminated portion of the property could be cut out of this acquisition, and the closing on the contaminated portion of the property could be delayed until such time as remediation is complete, in which case the purchase price would be adjusted accordingly. Alternatively, purchaser may terminate this agreement. In the event further testing confirms the presence of contamination on the property but, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Four * Item 4, cont. Bureau of Waste Cleanup, such contamination, in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, does not require some form of remediation, then the purchaser will proceed with the closing after making a determination that the area of contamination will not effect the ownership or management of the property. In addition to the Metals found in the Sprayfield on the Sebastian Creek property, testing in the vicinity of a maintenance garage indicated that groundwater concentrations of trimethyl benzene and naphthalene were elevated above guidance concentrations. Guidance concentrations are recommended levels above which prolonged exposure may result in adverse health effects. Currently there are no drinking water standards for these compounds. It is not anticipated that these groundwater concentrations will affect the ownership or management of the property by the managing agency. A certified survey is currently underway and will be provided by the seller with the purchaser reimbursing the seller for actual reasonable costs. Sebastian Creek, one of the most important aggregation sites for the endangered manatee on Florida's east coast, is surrounded by a large island of natural flatwoods, marshes, swamps, and scrub in a sea of agriculture and housing. The Sebastian Creek CARL project will protect the manatee by protecting the natural lands in the creek basin and will give the residents of the fast- growing cities of Brevard and Indian River counties a large area for fishing, hiking, and other pursuits. The hammocks, swamps, and pine plantations east and south of Lake George are important habitat for bald eagles, black bear, and other wildlife. They are also important in maintaining the water quality of the lake, one of the most popular in the state for recreation. The Lake George CARL project will protect and restore the natural commonties of this area; preserve a large area for wildlife, together with the Ocala National Forest and Lake Woodruff National Wildlife Refuge; and ensure that the public will be able to enjoy the recreational and scenic values of Lake George in the future. The Sebastian Creek property will be managed by the Division of Marine Resources in an effort to protect the West Indian Manatee by providing an upland buffer to Sebastian Creek and by limiting development in the area, thereby maintaining upland habitat diversity and protecting the water quality of the Indian River- Malabar to Vero Beach Aquatic Preserve. The Lake George property will be managed by the Division of Forestry to restore, maintain and protect all native ecosystems; to integrate compatible human use; and to insure long-term viability of rare population of species. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Land section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 4, Pages 1-101)RECOMMEND APPROVAL
* Item 5 C. Austin Bryant Option Agreement/Paynes Creek Division of Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings Project REQUEST: Consideration of an option agreement to acquire 26.2 acres within the Paynes Creek Division of Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings project from C. Austin Bryant. COUNTY: Hardee LOCATION: Section 09, Township 33 South, Range 25 East Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Five * Item 5, cont. CONSIDERATION: $60,000
Porter APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION SELLER ACRES (03/14/95) VALUE PRICE DATE ------- ----- --------- ------- ------ --------- Bryant 26.2 $62,400 $62,400 $60,000 03/30/96 STAFF REMARKS: The Paynes Creek project is ranked number 41 on the Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings list. This agreement was negotiated by the Division of State Lands on behalf of the Division of Recreation and Parks under the Additions and Inholdings Preservation 2000 program. When the appraisal was ordered, the quality of access was not known. Consequently, the appraiser was asked to supply values with access and without access. The contract was negotiated based on the assumption that no legal access exists. Since the state owns the adjoining property, this will not effect the management of the property. All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing. In the event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the property or the proposed management of the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing. A certified survey and environmental site assessment will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing. This property will be managed as an addition to Paynes Creek State Historic Site by the Division of Recreation and Parks. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 5, Pages 1-20)RECOMMEND APPROVAL
* Item 6 Roger Alan Pangborn/Donna Lou Wicker- Option Agreement/Goldhead Branch Division of Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings Project REQUEST: Consideration of an option agreement to acquire 19.8 acres within the Goldhead Branch Division of Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings project from Roger Alan Pangborn and Donna Lou Wicker. COUNTY: Clay LOCATION: Section 07, Township 08 South, Range 24 East CONSIDERATION: $41,500
Emerson APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION SELLER ACRES (03/01/95) VALUE PRICE DATE -------- ------ ---------- ----- ------ -------- Pangborn, et al 19.8 $50,500 $50,500 $41,500 03/30/96 Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Six * Item 6, cont. STAFF REMARKS: The Goldhead Branch project is ranked number 44 on the Recreation and Parks Additions and Inholdings list. This agreement was negotiated by the Division of State Lands on behalf of the Division of Recreation and Parks under the Additions and Inholdings Preservation 2000 program. All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing. In the event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the property or the proposed management of the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing. A certified survey and environmental site assessment will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing. This property will be managed as an addition to the Mike Roess Goldhead Branch State Park by the Division of Recreation and Parks. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 6, Pages 1-24)RECOMMEND APPROVAL
* Item 7 Barry University/Florida Board of Regents/Florida Atlantic University/BOT Purchase Agreement REQUEST: Consideration of a purchase agreement among the Florida Board of Regents, Florida Atlantic University and the Board of Trustees to acquire 50 acres of land from Barry University. COUNTY: St. Lucie APPLICANT:Florida Atlantic University LOCATION: Sections 23, 24, 25 and 26, Township 36 South, Range 39 East CONSIDERATION: $2,350,000REVIEW NO. 519005
Gray Ford APPROVED PURCHASE CLOSING ACRES (01/27/95) (01/25/95) VALUE PRICE DATE ----- --------- ------- ------ -------- -------- 50 $2,225,000 $2,350,000 $2,350,000 $2,350,000 90 days after BOT approval STAFF REMARKS: This acquisition was negotiated by Florida Atlantic University (FAU). Funds for this acquisition were appropriated by the 1994 Florida Legislature and are still available. The Board of Regents approved this acquisition on May 17, 1994. All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing. In the event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Seven * Item 7, cont. affect the value of the property or the proposed management of the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing. A certified survey and environmental site assessment will be provided by FAU prior to closing. This property will be managed by Florida Atlantic University as a satellite campus through a lease to the Florida Board of Regents. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(01), F.S., the Education section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 7, Pages 1-27)RECOMMEND APPROVAL
* Item 8 Release of P2000 Funds to Acquire Interest/SJRWMD/Pumpkin Hill CARL Project REQUEST: Release of $602,470.17 from the Preservation 2000 Trust Fund for the acquisition of an undivided 50 percent interest in 650.97 acres within the Pumpkin Hill CARL project from the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) COUNTY: Duval LOCATION: Sections 29 and 30, Township 01 North, Range 28 East; and Section 31, Township 01 North, Range 28 East. CONSIDERATION: $602,470.17 (The Board of Trustees 50 percent share of the total purchase price of $1,204,940.35) STAFF REMARKS: The Pumpkin Hill Creek CARL project is ranked number 19 on the 1995 CARL Bargain\Shared Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 14, 1995, and qualifies for purchase under the Division of State Lands Land Acquisition Workplan. The Pumpkin Hill Creek project contains 6,292 acres, of which 2,655 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 2,986 acres or 47.5 percent of this project will remain to be acquired. On September 13, 1994, the Board of Trustees authorized staff to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with the District to acquire the Pumpkin Hill Creek CARL project in accordance with section 259.041(16), F.S. (1994) utilizing the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S., with some technical survey modifications that have been incorporated into the Agreement. On September 14, 1994, the Governing Board of the District approved and executed the Acquisition Agreement and it has been executed by the Director of the Division of State Lands on behalf of the Board of Trustees. The District has acquired the Wallace/Kogut and Penland property, lying within the Pumpkin Hill project, in fee simple utilizing District acquisition procedures set out in Section 373.139, F.S. Title to the parcel is currently held jointly by the District and the Board of Trustees. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, on January 11, 1995 and February 8, 1995, respectively, the Governing Board of the District adopted Resolution No. 95-08 & Resolution 95-10, respectively, requesting reimbursement from the Board of Trustees for the costs for acquisition Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Eight * Item 8, cont. of the Penland and Wallace/Kogut parcels. The resolution contains all of the assurances required by the Acquisition Agreement. As provided for in the Acquisition Agreement, the District has requested reimbursement of 50 percent of its preacquisition costs (appraisal fees) and reimbursement of 50 percent of its closing costs (recording, title insurance policy and survey costs). Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, the preacquisition and closing costs will be reimbursed from CARL incidental expense funds previously released by the Board of Trustees. The Districts resolution contains all of the assurances required by the Acquisition Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the District contracted to purchase Penlands ownership at 100 percent of the approved value and Wallace/Kogut ownership at 93 percent of the approved value. The Board of Trustees' purchase price will be 50 percent of the contract price negotiated by the District plus 50 percent of the costs incurred in the purchase of the property. The property will be managed as the Pumpkin Hill Creek Buffer State Reserve by the Division of Marine Resources. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 8, Pages 1-15)RECOMMEND APPROVAL
* Item 9 St.Johns River Water Management District Acquisition Agreement/Etoniah Creek/Cross Florida Greenway CARL Projects REQUEST: Authority to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with St. Johns River Water Management District for the Etoniah Creek\Cross Florida Greenway CARL projects. COUNTY: Putnam and Clay LOCATION: Sections 28-33, Township 07 South, Range 25 East; Sections 22-27, Township 08 South, Range 24 East; Sections 01-35, Township 8 South, Range 25 East; Sections 12 and 13, Township 09 South, Range 24 East; Sections 01-38, Township 09 South, Range 25 East; Sections 18, 19, 30, 31, 39 and 40, Township 09 South, Range 26 East; Sections 01-06, 09-15, 29, 32- 34, Township 10 South, Range 24 East; Sections 01-06, 09-15, 22- 36, Township 10 South, Range 25 East; Sections 06, 07, 18-20, 29- 32, Township 10 South, Range 26 East; Sections 01-06, 13, 14, Township 11 South, Range 24 East; Sections 01-11, 13-15, Township 11 South, Range 25 East; Sections 32, Township 11 South, Range 26 East. STAFF REMARKS: The Etoniah Creek\Cross Florida Greenway CARL project is ranked number 11 on the Priority CARL List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 14, 1995, and is partially funded under the Division of State Lands Land Acquisition Workplan. The proposed agreement covers approximately 15,220 acres within the Project. To facilitate the acquisition of this project, the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) has offered to take the lead in the acquisition of the project. Staff has prepared an agreement that would allow the District to acquire the Etoniah Creek\Cross Florida CARL project in accordance with section 259.041(1), F.S., utilizing the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S. On Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Nine Item 9, cont. September 13, 1994, the Board of Trustees approved the use of the District's procedures to allow the District to acquire lands to be held jointly by the Board of Trustees and the District. At that time the Trustees determined, consistent with section 259.041(1), F.S., that the substitution of the District’s procedures for its own procedures was reasonably prudent and the public's interest was being reasonably protected. This agreement will allow the District to utilize its procedures and acquire the property fully funded by the Board of Trustees with the property vesting entirely with the Board of Trustees. If the Board of Trustees approves this item, the District staff will present the agreement to its Governing Board for execution at its next board meeting. Upon receipt of the executed agreement from the District, staff will execute the agreement on behalf of the Board of Trustees. Incorporated into the agreement are a number of assurances that the District is giving the Board of Trustees in return for its consideration of this agreement. The District has agreed to: 1) comply with the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S.; 2) defend the Board of Trustees against all title and survey disputes or defects and environmental contamination associated with each acquisition negotiated by the District that were either known or should have been known by the District at the time it closes a parcel on behalf of the Board of Trustees; and, 3) reimburse the Board of Trustees 100 percent of any overpayment of the purchase price, if an audit or investigation determines that the purchase price paid exceeded the actual appraised value. Under the proposed agreement, the District staff will obtain and review appraisals, negotiate a purchase contract and secure the approval of its governing board. The District will provide DSL with a board resolution covering the assurances noted in the previous paragraph and requesting authorization to proceed with the purchase of the parcel. Staff will request Board of Trustees' authorization to proceed for each parcel the District contracts to purchase. In addition, the agreement provides for the District to be reimbursed all costs associated with its attempt to acquire lands within the project, including all pre- acquisition and closing related costs, with the pre-acquisition costs being reimbursed even if the District is unsuccessful in acquiring any property. The agreement authorizes staff to reimburse these costs from CARL incidental expense funds previously released by the Board of Trustees. If the Board of Trustees approves the purchase, the District will proceed to closing with title to be vested in the Board of Trustees. Staff recommends that the Board of Trustees find that the procedures set out in Section 373.139 and used by the District are reasonably prudent procedures and the public’s interest is reasonably protected and coupled with the assurances to be provided by the District’s Governing Board meet the standards necessary for ownership by the Board of Trustees. The Etoniah Creek\Cross Florida Greenway CARL project will be managed by the Division of Forestry as a state forest and the Office of Greenways and Trails of the Department of Environmental Protection, will manage the remaining lands in the vicinity of the old Cross Florida Barge Canal. This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 9, Pages 1-6)RECOMMEND APPROVAL
Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Ten * Item 10 10 Year Sovereignty, Submerged Land Live Rock Aquaculture Lease REQUEST: Issuance of a ten-year sovereignty, submerged land live rock aquaculture lease containing 2.5 acres, more or less. COUNTY: Monroe Application No. 44-AQ-215 APPLICANT: Nanette Young LOCATION: Between Long Point Key and Crawl Key, in Florida Bay, in Class III Outstanding Florida Waters, within the local jurisdiction of Monroe County, at the following (latitude/longitude) coordinates: Latitude Longitude Description 80°58'59.76"W 24°45'28.47"N Northwest Corner 80°58'56.33"W 24°45'30.86"N Northeast Corner 80°58'58.90"W 24°45'26.23"N Southwest Corner 80°58'54.57"W 24°45'28.71"N Southeast Corner CONSIDERATION: $61.74, representing (1) an initial lease fee of $15.58 per acre or fraction thereof; and (2) an annual surcharge of $15, representing $5 per acre or fraction thereof, for deposit in the Marine Biological Trust Fund pursuant to Section 370.16(4)(b), F.S. The lease fees shall be adjusted every five years, based upon the five-year average change in the Consumer Price Index. STAFF REMARKS: The applicant is requesting approval of a commercial aquaculture lease to cultivate and harvest artificial live rock within a 2.5 acre parcel of sovereignty, submerged land, in Florida Bay. The proposed project involves the placement of approximately 75,000 pounds of quarried coral (non- indigenous) rock per year, in order to recruit larval marine organisms from a corridor of hard bottom habitat adjacent to the proposed lease site. Once a desired rock growth stage has been achieved, the applicant will harvest the rocks and sell them in conjunction with the aquarium trade. In May 1989 the department adopted a policy against harvesting (wild) live rock within the territorial limits of Florida. Subsequently, on July 1, 1992, the Florida Marine Fisheries Commission closed the harvest of live rock in state waters. In lieu of wild harvest, the department opted to encourage aquaculture, using rock obtained from upland sources as a means to fill the demand of live rock for the aquarium trade (a 1.6 billion dollar U. S. industry, and four billion spent on the aquarium trade worldwide). Live rock is now an integral part of the entire marine life aquarium trade. The federal government has implemented a phase-out of all live rock harvested in federal waters. By the end of 1996, no wild live rock can be harvested in federal waters. As such, persons such as the applicant, whose livelihood is dependent on the harvest of live rock, will be put out of business, unless such harvest takes place on approved live rock aquaculture leases in state waters, and permitted sites in federal waters. The proposed project is located within Monroe County, designated as Outstanding Florida Waters; as such, no dredge/fill permit should be issued if such activity damages the viability of a living stony coral community, soft coral community, sponge bed, or marine seagrass community. The field staff opined that no adverse impacts to those resources would occur because the proposed project was reduced to only 2.5 acres, from the original five acres, and that site is void of seagrass beds and such other significant resources. This position was reaffirmed by the staff of the Submerged Lands and Environmental Resources Permitting Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Eleven * Item 10, cont. Program that indicated that the proposed project qualifies for a deminimus exemption, indicating that no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated from the proposed activities, provided that the special lease conditions were implemented. Objections to the proposed lease were received from staff of the Division of Recreation and Parks' Bureau of Parks District 5 and one property owner. Objections by the DRP were based on the location of the proposed lease within or immediately adjacent to the management line for the Curry Hammock Management Area. Review by the Bureau of Survey and Mapping indicated that the proposed lease was more than 3,000 feet from the management line. Subsequently, the Division of Recreation and Parks recommended that the application be approved and indicated that the distance between the proposed location and the management area is expected to provide an adequate buffer zone and safeguards. The objections of the property owner were also based on the location of the proposed lease and the potential for adverse environmental impacts to adjacent habitats. The proposed lease is about 1,000 feet from the upland property and the attached resource assessment report indicates that the proposed activities are not expected to result in adverse environmental impacts. The proposed project site is an average of ten feet in depth. The applicant's business plan stipulates the preemption of no more than 15 inches of the water column. A consideration of the status of any local government comprehensive plans was not made for this item. The department has determined that the proposed action is not subject to the local government planning process. (See Attachment 10, Pages 1-40) RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO FINAL ACTION BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL LEASE CONDITIONS * Item 11 Eugene M. Steffan (d/b/a Palm Grove Marina, Inc.), Lease Modification REQUEST: Consideration of an application for a modification of a five-year sovereignty, submerged land lease to contain 85,682 square feet, more or less, for an expansion of a commercial marina. COUNTY: Lee Lease No. 360706835 Application No. 360019035 LOCATION: Section 19, Township 46 South, Range 24 East, in Matanzas Pass, Class II Waters, Resource Protection Area 3, within the local jurisdiction of Lee County. Aquatic Preserve: Estero Bay Outstanding Florida Waters: Yes CONSIDERATION: $24,216.78 representing (1) $6,716.78 as the initial lease fee computed at the base rate of $0.1038 per square foot, discounted 30 percent because of the first-come, first- served nature of the facility, and including the initial 25 percent surcharge for the additional area; and (2) $17,500 as an administrative fine. Sales tax will be assessed pursuant to section Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Twelve * Item 11, cont. 212.031, F.S., if applicable. The lease fee may be adjusted based on seven percent of the rental rate pursuant to section 18- 21.011, F.A.C. STAFF REMARKS: The applicant is requesting after-the-fact authorization for a one-slip expansion of an existing 78-slip commercial marina, presently used in conjunction with the upland commercial marina facility, thereby creating a 79-slip facility. The marina currently provides mooring area outside the authorized lease area for a cruise ship. The 165-foot long, 350-passenger, SeaKruz vessel is operated by Europa Cruises Corporation, and transports passengers to beyond the state's territorial limits for gambling excursions. The existing sovereignty, submerged land lease, approved by the Board of Trustees on March 6, 1984, and modified in 1989, authorizes the preemption of 66,756 square feet of sovereignty lands. The proposed expansion area contains 18,926 square feet of sovereignty lands. In November 1991, staff became aware of the lessee's intent to moor a cruise ship at the marina via a local newspaper article and staff subsequently formally notified the lessee by letter dated November 12, 1991, that authorization from the Board of Trustees would be required to moor the cruise ship outside of the current authorized lease area. A December 5, 1991, site inspection confirmed that the cruise ship was mooring at the marina outside of the approved lease area. On December 11, 1992, staff issued a Temporary Use Agreement (TUA) for one year for the temporary use of 11,460 square feet for mooring of the cruise ship. The TUA did not include assessment of an administrative fine for the violation of illegal docking because the lessee had been paying lease fees based on seven percent of the rental rate. However, staff is now requesting the Board of Trustees to consider assessment of an administrative fine because the act of mooring the cruise ship was a direct violation of the lease and it occurred after the November 12, 1991, letter was sent. Initially, staff had proposed not assessing an administrative fine because the applicant was paying for use of the area and it was thought that the processing would be completed within the year allowed under the TUA. The requirements to obtain a modified lease were listed in the November 1991 letter, yet it took the applicant until January 1993 to provide a list of surrounding owners to be noticed and a letter stating consistency with the local comprehensive plan, until October 1993 for the applicant to provide acceptable public interest, and until April 1995 for the applicant to provide an acceptable survey. Initially staff proposed a larger administrative fine based on the length of time taken to complete the lease modification application. However, since staff and the applicant continued to work toward completion of the application, even after the TUA had expired, the fine as currently proposed by staff no longer includes the multiplier for aggravating or mitigating factors. Staff proposes calculating the administrative fine based on the methodology pursuant to Trustees' policy of August 14, 1990, at the rate of $0.50 per square foot. However, because the fine is more than the maximum base fine, the maximum base fine of $2,500 will apply. A multiplier of two is applied to the base fine because the activity took place within an aquatic preserve ($5,000). A multiplier of one is applied since staff is now recommending approval of the previously unauthorized activity ($2,500). A multiplier of four is applied because the existing facility was under lease which constitutes written notice ($10,000). The total recommended administrative fine is $17,500. The applicant stated that the cruise ship has a draft of 6.5 feet, that mean low water depths in the proposed expanded lease area range from -6.3 feet to -16.4 feet, and that mean low water depths in the nearby federal navigation channel range from -10 to -14 feet. Although there are no seagrasses in the area, the following operational procedures negotiated between staff and the applicant to reduce turbidity and prop wash are being implemented: (1) small tug boats are used to guide the vessel during approaches and departures; (2) the vessel is moored so that the propellers are located over deep water in the channel; (3) the vessel approaches and departs Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Thirteen * Item 11, cont. parallel to the dock; and (4) departures entail backing into the federal turning basin with depths of -14 feet. Limitations on the maximum depths of vessels allowed to moor in this area are included as special lease conditions pursuant to section 18- 20.004(5)(a)3, F.A.C. All of the slips will continue to be maintained on an open to the public, first-come, first-served basis; this has been addressed as a special lease condition. The project is located in an aquatic preserve. Staff is of the opinion that the project is in the public interest. The applicant was not required to obtain a DEP wetland resource permit because the additional area was for mooring only; no dredging or filling was to occur. There are no submerged resources or seagrasses in the expansion area. The recommendations of the Division of Marine Resources are included as special lease conditions. The expanded lease area is located within the western 25-foot setback area and a waiver has been obtained from the affected property owner. The lease modification was not required to be noticed. A local government comprehensive plan has been adopted for this area pursuant to section 163.3167, F.S.; however, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) has determined that the plan is not in compliance. In accordance with the compliance agreement between the DCA and the local government, an amendment has been adopted which brought the plan into compliance. The proposed action is consistent with the adopted plan according to a letter received from Lee County. (See Attachment 11, Pages 1-7) RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL LEASE
CONDITIONS AND PAYMENT OF $6,716.78 PLUS
AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $17,500 * Item 12 Island Marina, Inc., Lease Modification REQUEST: Consideration of an application for a modification of a 25-year sovereignty, submerged land lease to contain a total of 66,716 square feet, more or less, for an expansion of an existing commercial docking facility. COUNTY: Collier Lease No. 111000635 Application No. 112545225 LOCATION: Section 17, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in the Cocohatchee River, Class II waters, within the local jurisdiction of Collier County. Aquatic Preserve: No Outstanding Florida Waters: No (currently proposed for OFW status) CONSIDERATION: $5,210.37 as the initial lease fee computed at the base rate of $0.1038 per square foot, discounted 30 percent because of the first-come, first-served nature of the facility, and including the initial 25 percent surcharge payment for the additional area. Sales tax will be assessed pursuant to section 212.031, F.S., if applicable. The lease fee may be adjusted based on seven percent of the rental rate pursuant to section 18- 21.011, F.A.C. Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Fourteen * Item 12, cont. STAFF REMARKS: The applicant is proposing to expand the lease boundary of an existing 80-slip commercial docking facility by extending the boundary waterward of its existing location. The original sovereignty, submerged land lease, approved by the Board of Trustees on February 12, 1991, authorized the preemption of 52,736 square feet of sovereignty lands to construct an 80-slip commercial marina. In 1990, a request was presented to the Board of Trustees from Shelter Island Joint Venture for a submerged land lease for an 80- slip commercial docking facility to be developed in conjunction with a 91-unit condominium. At that time, staff recommended denial because the number of slips exceeded the number allowed for the condominium development. The applicant requested deferral of its request and then withdrawal from the following Board of Trustees meeting to obtain local approval. Subsequently, Shelter Island Joint Venture revised its upland plans by deeding the shoreline to Island Marina, Inc., which then proposed to construct and operate the 80-slip commercial marina. Condominiums were still proposed to be constructed on the interior property and the unit owners would have no riparian shoreline or any rights to use the marina beyond the 21 slips the ownership oriented upland facility would have qualified for had that entity remained the riparian upland property owner. That request was approved and represents the lease in effect today. This lease does not stipulate lengths or drafts of vessels. Subsequent to execution of the 1991 lease, complaints were received regarding advertising associated with the condominium. The 1991 lease contained a special lease condition that required the Lessee to advertise the facility as open to the public on a first-come, first-served basis by constructing permanent signs at the waterward entrance to the docking facility and at the upland entrance to the condominium development to clearly state that all of the berths are available for rental by the general public. The applicant installed the signs; however, advertising associated with the condominium included visuals of the docking facility and provided information on the slips. According to the applicant, 39 advertisements were released by the condominium, three of which referred to a "private marina" being associated with the condominium. The agent for the applicant acknowledged the mistake (after two of the advertisements) and stated that a mistake had been made and the mistake would not occur in the future. Two additional advertisements (dated July 1993 and February 1994) were supplied by the Attorney General's office bringing the total to five erroneous advertisements out of a total of 41. The applicant has stated that the advertising was handled by the condominium, not the marina owner, and that the two entities are separate. At this time, the issue may be moot because all of the units have been sold and the developer is no longer associated with the condominium. The special lease condition pertaining to advertising of marina slips as open to the public was revised to specifically require that "any and all advertising" shall refer to the facility as open to the public; this revised condition will be part of this modified lease. On May 28, 1991, the marina was conveyed to the condominium, incorporated as a unit of the condominium, and reseparated. After this action took place, the department reviewed the transactions and determined that the marina still qualified as a commercial marina. The lease was then amended to add a special lease condition prohibiting future transfers without Trustees' knowledge. The docking facility was not built as originally authorized and permitted; the perimeter dock was constructed two feet wider and four additional access ramps were built. These changes were required by Collier County to accommodate local ordinances. In addition, the perimeter dock was constructed 54 feet longer and placed between three and 14 feet waterward of its approved location in an effort to follow the -4 foot bottom contour. This resulted in a docking structure of the size and configuration authorized by the Board of Trustees, but located outside the lease Board of Trustees Agenda - November 29, 1995 Page Fifteen * Item 12, cont. boundary. The applicant was notified of the violation and voluntarily removed the portions of the structure that extended beyond the lease boundary. This action brought the project within the preemption limits that had been originally approved. The applicant subsequently sought approval for the revised structure from Collier County, the former DER, and the Board of Trustees. The Division of State Lands authorized a modified lease in 1992 via a delegation of authority to authorize the as- built structures within the original lease boundary. The current request will authorize 13,980 square feet of additional sovereign lands to allow the applicant to install floating finger pier extensions and to relocate and place new mooring pilings, thereby providing wetslips of the size originally authorized by the Board of Trustees within the newly expanded lease area. No additional slips or vessels larger than originally authorized are proposed at this time; however, the DEP Southwest District staff is presently processing a modification to allow larger vessels with deeper drafts and to preempt 14,000 additional square feet. The future request will be presented to the Board of Trustees for consideration when the file is deemed complete. The docking facility will continue to be maintained on an open to the public, first-come, first-served basis; the existing special lease conditions will be included in the modified lease. An April 20, 1994, site inspection verified that the applicant is in compliance with the existing lease and all fees are current. The proposed project is in accordance with the DEP modified wetland resource permit that prohibits liveaboards and fueling facilities, and authorizes a sewage pumpout facility. Recommendations from the Division of Marine Resources regarding manatees and shellfish have been addressed. There are no seagrasses located within the expansion area. The proposed project was not required to be noticed. A local government comprehensive plan has been adopted for this area pursuant to section 163.3167, F.S.; however, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) determined that the plan is not in compliance. In accordance with the Compliance Agreement between DCA and the local government, an amendment has been adopted which brought the plan into compliance. The proposed action is consistent with the adopted plan as amended according to a letter received from Collier County. (See Attachment 12, Pages 1-39) RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL LEASE
CONDITIONS AND PAYMENT OF $5,210.37